ÄÁÅÙÃ÷»ó¼¼º¸±â

MATLAB & SimulinkÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ ÇÇÇÏÁö¹æ Àü±âÀÚ±ØÀ» ÅëÇÑ ÇǺÎ-Àü±â ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽ºÀÇ µ¿Àû ÀÓÇÇ´ø½º ¸ðµ¨¿¬±¸(Dynamic Impedance Model of the Skin-E
MATLAB & SimulinkÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ ÇÇÇÏÁö¹æ Àü±âÀÚ±ØÀ» ÅëÇÑ ÇǺÎ-Àü±â ÀÎÅÍÆäÀ̽ºÀÇ µ¿Àû ÀÓÇÇ´ø½º ¸ðµ¨¿¬±¸(Dynamic Impedance Model of the Skin-E
  • ÀúÀÚJose Luis Vargas Luna, Matthias Krenn, Jorge Armando Cortes Ramirez, Winfried Mayr Àú
  • ÃâÆÇ»ç¾ÆÁø
  • ÃâÆÇÀÏ2020-07-14
  • µî·ÏÀÏ2020-12-21
º¸À¯ 1, ´ëÃâ 0, ¿¹¾à 0, ´©Àû´ëÃâ 9, ´©Àû¿¹¾à 0

Ã¥¼Ò°³

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation can depolarize nerve or muscle cells applying
impulses through electrodes attached on the skin. For these applications, the
electrode-skin impedance is an important factor which influences effectiveness.
Various models describe the interface using constant or current-depending
resistive-capacitive equivalent circuit. Here, we develop a dynamic impedance
model valid for a wide range stimulation intensities.
The model considers electroporation and charge-dependent effects to describe the
impedance variation, which allows to describe high-charge pulses. The parameters
were adjusted based on rectangular, biphasic stimulation pulses generated by a
stimulator, providing optionally current or voltage-controlled impulses, and applied
through electrodes of different sizes. Both control methods deliver a different
electrical field to the tissue, which is constant throughout the impulse duration for
current-controlled mode or have a very current peak for voltage-controlled. The
results show a predominant dependence in the current intensity in the case of both
stimulation techniques that allows to keep a simple model. A verification
simulation using the proposed dynamic model shows coefficient of determination of
around 0.99 in both stimulation types. The presented method for fitting
electrode-skin impedance can be simple extended to other stimulation waveforms
and electrode configuration. Therefore, it can be embedded in optimization
algorithms for designing electrical stimulation applications even for pulses with
high charges and high current spikes.

¸ñÂ÷

Á¦ 1Æí : SIMULINK ±âº»Æí
1.1 SIMULINKÀÇ ½ÃÀÛ 1
ºí·ÏÀÇ ¿¬°á 5
ºí·Ï ÆĶó¹ÌÅÍÀÇ ¼³Á¤ 7
½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ǠÆĶó¹ÌÅÍ (Configuration Parameters)ÀÇ ¼³Á¤ 8
½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼ÇÀÇ ¼öÇà 9
ºí·Ï ÆĶó¹ÌÅÍÀǠǥ½Ã 9
º¹¼ö µ¥ÀÌÅÍÀǠǥ½Ã 11
2.2 µ¿Àû ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼Ǡ13
ÀÌÂ÷ ¹ÌºÐ¹æÁ¤½Ä 17
¼±Çü »óź¯¼ö ¸ðµ¨ 23
DC ¸ðÅÍÀÇ ½Ã¹Ä·¹À̼Ǡ24
ÇÔ¼ö ºí·ÏÀÇ »ç¿ë 29
Â÷ºÐ¹æÁ¤½Ä(difference equation)ÀÇ ¸ðµ¨¸µ 34
Subsystem(ºÎ½Ã½ºÅÛ)ÀÇ ±¸¼º 37
Á¦ 2Æí : ¿¬±¸³í¹®
Dynamic Impedance Model of the Skin-Electrode Interface for
Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation
1. Introduction 41
2. Methodology42
3. Data Processing 47
4. Results 48
5. Discussion 51
6. Conclusions 53
7. References 54

ÇÑÁÙ ¼­Æò